Hot! British Court Decision: Surveillance Law Rejected

The UK high court has decided that emergency surveillance legislation, which was introduced under the UK coalition government, is unlawful, reports the Guardian.

Image Credit: Ben Sutherland (Flickr)

Image Credit: Ben Sutherland (Flickr)

Labor politician Tom Watson and Conservative politician David Davis posed the judicial challenge, which has now been upheld by judges who found that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 is “inconsistent with European Union law.”

 

Thailand Lawyers, Chaninat and Leeds have decades of experience in successfully defending criminal law cases.

The act states that Internet and phone companies are required to keep records of communications for a year. It also states how police and intelligence may use this data.

 
The politicians argued that the current law enabled police and security services to spy on citizens without sufficient privacy safeguards in place. They said that this went against article eight of the European convention on human rights (the right to respect for private and family life) plus articles seven and eight of the EU charter of fundamental rights (respect for private and family life and protection of personal data.)

 
Lord Justice Bean and Mr Justice Collins agreed. They have declared section 1 of the act “does not lay down clear and precise rules providing for access to and use of communications data.” They ruled that the order should be suspended until after 31 March 2016 “to give parliament the opportunity to put matters right”.

 
Read the full story at the Guardian.